|
|
Artifacts
Botanical Samples
Throughout the excavations, archaeologists collected 105
flotation samples (mostly 10 liters in size) from all features
as well as from A horizon contexts at each site. Samples were
processed in PAF’s laboratory facilities using a FloTech
flotation machine. The heavy fraction generated by flotation
was sorted into broad material classes (e.g., carbon, fauna,
lithics, ceramics, FCR). Carbonized remains were then submitted
for analysis.
Comparison of the Late Archaic/Early Woodland and Late Woodland
botanical data suggest both stability and change in the prehistoric
use of the upland Herrick Hollow area. A comparison of the
carbonized wood charcoal suggests there may have been rather
dramatic shifts in the composition of the forest community.
During the Late Archaic/Early Woodland the forest community
appears to have been nearly exclusively upland beech-maple-birch-pine.
There is evidence for the presence of openings in the forest
which may have attracted deer. By the Late Woodland period,
oak-hickory-chestnut forests had crept up Herrick Hollow,
although the surrounding higher elevations still supported
the dominant beech-maple-birch-pine forest.
Regardless of time period, nut and seed use appears to have
been relatively low at all of the Herrick Hollow sites). It
appears that groups opportunistically collected nut mast when
available, but nuts never appear to have been a targeted resource
at these upland sites. While there is a lack of data indicating
what sorts of food resources, if any, were brought to the
site during the Late Archaic/Early Woodland, groups visiting
the site during the Late Woodland carried small amounts of
dried fruit and shelled corn to the site. The recovery of
nutshell fragments from both the Late Archaic/Early Woodland
and Late Woodland periods suggests the sites were visited
in the fall, although use of the sites during other seasons
cannot be ruled out.
No faunal remains were recovered at Herrick Hollow; however,
this most likely reflects preservation biases, rather than
actual subsistence behavior. It may be the case that Herrick
Hollow was used as a favored hunting ground during both the
Late Archaic/Early Woodland and Late Woodland. Openings in
the forest canopy in this headwater region may have served
as natural deeryards in the fall and winter. If deer did concentrate
in these areas, then the Herrick Hollow sites may represent
short-term camps associated with deer hunting. If the Herrick
Hollow complex was sufficiently far from a Late Archaic/Early
Woodland base camp or from a Late Woodland hamlet/village,
hunters targeting upland resources (possibly deer, but mainly
small game such as turkey and fur-bearing animals) would have
brought some provisions (i.e., dried fruit, maize) to be used
at an ephemeral camp site.
<CERAMIC
TECHNOLOGY |